After Donald Trump’s stunning victory in the 2024 election, Democrats had to confront what went wrong. One conclusion from their analysis was that progressives had a serious man problem, and they were right this time.
Democrats made contempt for men—especially young white men—central to their message, with significant consequences. Any white man remaining on the left had to accept he was either uniquely guilty or expected to participate in his own dispossession. The party even launched a $20 million effort to discover why men were leaving it, only to conclude that men were simply bad and deserved what they got.
Young men who believe the system is organized against them— and who have substantial evidence for that belief—will organize to defend their interests.
This should have created a golden opportunity for the Republican Party to secure the loyalty of young men for a generation.
Instead, conservatives are setting that opportunity on fire.
Men’s natural role in society is to protect, provide, and lead. Even when women earn good incomes, data consistently show they prefer men who are at least as successful as they are. Women generally do not form families with men who cannot find stable work, buy homes, or attain the status markers that signal competence and security.
A society that blocks young men from those roles is choosing dysfunction and decay.
In a recent Fox News interview, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt blamed the rise of democratic socialism on Gen Z. She claimed young people were “raised with silver spoons in their mouths,” called them lazy, and suggested sending them to Cuba or Iran.
Calling those remarks callous and tone-deaf would be generous.
Leavitt married a millionaire real estate developer more than 30 years her senior. It is unlikely that her “silver spoon” would be adjusted by deployment to a foreign combat zone. The entitlement only became more obvious when she defended the comments after deserved criticism.
The message to young people was unmistakable: Their concerns are not legitimate, and we despise them for expecting us to fix anything.
Of course, some young people are lazy and entitled. Every generation has its share. That does not mean most young men are or that the obstacles they face are imaginary.
Young men—especially young white men—have been systematically excluded from educational institutions, corporate hiring, and promotion. This is not mere resentment or speculation; it is the predictable result of decades of cultural indoctrination and civil-rights enforcement that trained institutions to prefer women, immigrants, and minorities whenever possible.
That has real consequences. Men who cannot secure education, employment, and status are less likely to marry or form families, no matter how often our culture repeats slogans about equality.
Housing has become another barrier. The average first-time home buyer is now approaching middle age. Young men cannot build wealth as their parents did or provide the stability women often want before marriage.
There are many reasons for this, including mass immigration and corporate speculation in residential real estate. But one factor is simply welfare for seniors. Many older Americans failed to save adequately for retirement and now depend on the inflated value of homes they bought decades ago.
President Trump has explicitly stated that he does not want housing prices to fall for this reason. This is a deliberate choice to sacrifice young men’s development and family formation to protect older asset holders.
Young men have also watched their country import foreigners, legally and illegally, to replace them. Immigrants receive special access to education loans, business programs, and hiring preferences unavailable to natives. Mass immigration drives up housing, insurance, medical, and education costs while transforming neighborhoods beyond recognition.
In Minneapolis, the mayor now manages Somali clan politics like a colonial regent simply to maintain control.
The question is not why young white men are radicalized. The question is why it took so long.
On July 4, during America’s 250th anniversary celebration, Patriot Front marched in Washington, D.C. The group consists largely of young white men in quasi-military uniforms carrying American flags.
A comical number of conservatives rushed online to call them federal agents after Reuters published a photo of one black woman sitting in a subway car full of Patriot Front members. It later appeared that the supposed new Rosa Parks was a homeless drug user with a record of indecent exposure.
She was certainly safer than Iryna Zarutska, who was stabbed in the neck by a mentally ill black man while riding public transportation alone. The Patriot Front members may even have prevented another indecent-exposure incident simply by being present.
Young white men remain the easiest group in America to attack publicly. The left has demonized them for existing, which should give the GOP an obvious opening.
Instead, conservatives once again take their social cues from progressives. Many still crave left-wing approval and believe belittling young white men proves they are neither sexist nor racist.
I do not think Patriot Front’s tactics are wise, and I have said so repeatedly. Nor is skepticism about the group irrational, given the relationship between the Southern Poverty Law Center, federal law enforcement, and manufactured panic over “white supremacy.”
But dismissing everything as a federal operation is easier than offering serious solutions. Telling ourselves that no legitimate grievances exist and that all unrest is manufactured is foolish and weak. If Patriot Front scares you, good. It should.
Young men who believe the system is organized against them— and who have substantial evidence for that belief—will organize to defend their interests. The answer is not to insult them, mock them, or pretend they are imagining their dispossession.
The answer is to address the problems driving them toward radical groups.
Young men are not asking conservatives to excuse every bad decision or endorse every organization that claims to speak for them. They are asking for a political movement that recognizes their interests, defends their future, and gives them a reason to build.
Conservatives should stop hating the young men they need to inherit the country.
